Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYuyucu Karabulut, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorŞenel, Engin
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, Hacı Halil
dc.contributor.authorDölek, Yasemin
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T08:57:21Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T08:57:21Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationYuyucu Karabulut, Y., Şenel, E., Karabulut, H. H., Dölek, Y. (2015). Three different clinical faces of the same histopathological entity: Hair follicle nevus, trichofolliculoma and accessory tragus. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 90(4), 519-522.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0365-0596
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20153785
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/905
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Hair follicle nevus is a rare, congenital hamartoma with follicular differentiation characterized histologically by numerous, tiny, mature hair follicles. Trichofolliculoma, the histopathological features of which are quite similar to those of hair follicle nevus, is also a hamartoma that differs from hair follicle. Accessory tragus is a relatively common, benign congenital abnormality of the external ear with an incidence rate of 1 to 10 per 1,000 live births. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to assess the discriminatory value of currently available, histological criteria in the differential diagnosis of hair follicle nevus, accessory tragi and trichofolliculoma. METHODS: Twenty-one patients comprising 9 cases of hair follicle nevus, 8 accessory tragi patients and 4 trichofolliculoma cases, were recruited to perform the study. RESULTS: There were 10 males and 11 females in the study group. No significant difference was observed between the three study groups in terms of age, gender or histopathological parameters such as density of hair follicles, subcutaneous fat score and presence of connective tissue framework. Cartilaginous component was seen in 8 cases that were diagnosed as accessory tragi, while central cyst and radiating hair follicles were seen in 4 cases which were diagnosed as trichofolliculoma. CONCLUSION: The results of our study showed that diagnostic discrimination of these diseases could be made only with the clinicopathologic correlation because of their clinical and histopathological similarities. © 2015 by Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia.en_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira de Dermatologiaen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1590/abd1806-4841.20153785en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHair Follicleen_US
dc.subjectNevusen_US
dc.subjectPathologyen_US
dc.titleThree different clinical faces of the same histopathological entity: Hair follicle nevus, trichofolliculoma and accessory tragusen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAnais Brasileiros de Dermatologiaen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8098-1686en_US
dc.identifier.volume90en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage519en_US
dc.identifier.endpage522en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster