Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTopaktaş, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorAltın, Selçuk
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Cemil
dc.contributor.authorAkkoç, Ali
dc.contributor.authorÜrkmez, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Zeynep Banu
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T15:05:14Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T15:05:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationTopaktaş, R., Altin, S., Aydin, C., Akkoç, A., Ürkmez, A., & Aydin, Z. B. (2020). Is spinal anesthesia an alternative and feasible method for proximal ureteral stone treatment?. Central European Journal of Urology, 73(3), 336.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2080-4806
dc.identifier.issn2080-4873
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2020.0049
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/7184
dc.description.abstractIntroduction We investigated the clinical, operational, and pain parameters of patients who underwent semirigid ureterorenoscopy (sURS) under spinal anesthesia (SA) and general anesthesia (GA) for proximal ureter stones. Material and methods Patients treated with sURS after diagnosis of proximal ureter stones between January 2014 and May 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups (the SA group and the GA group) based on the type of anesthesia used. Perioperative variables and operation results were evaluated and compared. Success was defined as the patient being stone-free as observed on low-dose non-contrast computed tomography performed in the first month postoperatively. Results The SA and GA groups had 40 and 32 patients, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of age (p = 0.593), gender (p = 0.910), average stone size (p = 0.056), side (p = 0.958), or density (p = 0.337). Based on the Clavien classification system, complication rates between the two groups were similar. The postoperative visual pain scale in the SA group was statistically significantly lower (p <0.05) than in the GA group. Success rates in the SA and GA groups were found to be 90% (36/40) and 93.7% (30/32), respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.819). Conclusions Ureterorenoscopy, which is performed for proximal ureter stone treatment in adult patients, is a reliable surgical method that can be performed under both SA and GA. SA offers the advantage of reduced postoperative pain as compared to GA.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPolish Urological Assocen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCentral European Journal Of Urologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFeasibilityen_US
dc.subjectGeneral anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectProximal ureter stoneen_US
dc.subjectSpinal anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectUreterorenoscopyen_US
dc.titleIs spinal anesthesia an alternative and feasible method for proximal ureteral stone treatment?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.authoridTopaktaş, Ramazan / 0000-0003-3729-3284
dc.identifier.volume73en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage336en_US
dc.identifier.endpage341en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Topaktas, Ramazan; Urkmez, Ahmet] Haydarpasa Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey; [Altin, Selcuk] Necip Fazil Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Kahramanmaras, Turkey; [Aydin, Cemil] Hitit Univ, Dept Urol, Corum Erol Olcok Training & Res Hosp, Corum, Turkey; [Akkoc, Ali] Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Alanya, Turkey; [Aydin, Zeynep Banu] Hitit Univ, Dept Radiol, Corum Erol Olcok Training & Res Hosp, Corum, Turkey; [Topaktas, Ramazan; Urkmez, Ahmet] Haydarpasa Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, 23 Tibbiye St, TR-34668 Uskudar Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAydın, Cemil
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAydın, Zeynep Banu
dc.identifier.doi10.5173/ceju.2020.0049
dc.authorwosidTopaktaş, Ramazan / ABH-8184-2020
dc.description.wospublicationidWOS:000577891700014en_US
dc.description.scopuspublicationid2-s2.0-85092006167en_US
dc.description.pubmedpublicationidPubMed: 33133662en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster